Friday, November 26, 2010
Daniel Earls 's Group Reflection.
We decided on the topic of Irish Traditional music after debating about a topic leaning towards history. A few of the group members had a musical background and the focus on traditional Irish music meant that information resources would be relatively close at hand. Personally I’m completely unfamiliar with the conventions of Irish traditional music, but I never thought this was going to be a limiting factor since the main impulse behind the collection was an adequate structure and form, as opposed to comprehension of content.
We settled on the topic by the end of the class and by week 3 we were meeting once a week to discuss the collection. The group meetings I felt were all quite efficient as we made a point of always leaving with everybody having at least one task to complete. This lead to us building up quite a bit of momentum in terms of material covered and we managed to get to the reference tool evaluation stage fairly early on. I felt that our work management was well managed, more so than in some other groups I was involved in, and the even work distribution lead to a feeling of mutual appreciation and respect among the group members. However the early momentum lead to a consensus that we could defer the group meetings for a while and this may have delayed the potential completion of the overall project somewhat. Although our strong dynamic did compensate for any possible delay by each group member agreeing to a specific portion of work by a specific deadline; this lead to people who wanted to proceed to go ahead at their own pace.
Although I didn’t have a prior familiarity with traditional Irish music, I do listen to music regularly, so even though the project was structure orientated I thought I would be ok when it came to evaluating the reference tool. I had to evaluate the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music by Michael Kennedy and I found it a formidable task. Many of the dictionaries definitions had to be cross referenced and explored with various other music encyclopaedia’s as I was not familiar with much of the content.
I personally think I was very lucky with the group dynamic, as everybody got on really well and there was never any detectable conflict or tension at all within the group. It also proved useful as a socialising point and getting to know some very nice people. Hopefully this aspect of group harmony will be reflected in our presentation of the wiki.
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Lindsay's Group Reflection
The project, from my point of view went smoothly overall. We selected our topic quite early on, and arranged meetings each week from week 3 of the course. I felt this worked well because it meant we were all consistently working on the project, and it enabled us to divide work out evenly and effectively. So, our time management and workload distribution was very strong.
However, as we had worked so well early on for this project and so felt we were ‘ahead of the curve’ we did slow down midway through, and our meetings and workflow became more sporadic. I believe this prolonged the project unnecessarily, and the fact that all team members were quite easy-going possibly hampered a speedy finish somewhat. Having said that, I nonetheless feel the project went well; there was a willingness from each team member to get work done and everyone put a good effort in. Everyone seemed interested in the topic and enjoyed working together – we had fun working on this and there were no ostensible clashes of personality.
From my point of view I really enjoyed this project, both due to my other team members, but also because it is a subject I have a background in. Initially I was concerned that having previous knowledge of the subject would inevitably mean I would need to take on more work but that was not the case at all. Each team member, I felt, put in equal work and bought in to the project, so my concerns were unfounded. Conversely it is possibly the case that because I have knowledge on the subject that the project was a little easier for me, so potentially an advantage. Additionally, while knowledge of the subject matter may have some advantage, the fact that we had members of our group with library experience and technical expertise definitely added a lot of value (I would say more value) to the project.
The end result reflects the time and effort that went into the project and I am very happy with the result.
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Daniel Murray's Group Reflection
I need not have worried. The advantage of an MLIS course is that everyone is there because they want to be. The high levels of motivation and a determination to do well are shared. So almost as soon as the group was formed we were quickly discussing the options of what to do.
The initial topic was history before we decided on music, specifically Irish music as it is a niche interest we could specialise in while at the same time being an extremely popular genre that would be much in demand.
The choice of music was another ‘comfort zone’ I was out of, as I can barely tell the difference between a music sheet and a spreadsheet. However, the project did not require actual understanding of musicology, just the same set of skills needed for any library project in the future. The choice of music in that regard was extremely useful, teaching me the importance of flexibility in a world where we do not always get things that interest us specifically.
There was some debate on issues such as to who our target group would be, which were resolved quickly and efficiently. We were all keen to engage with the project and wanted to keep a steady pace going while ensuring nothing was left behind or undone.
There have been several group projects in the course for different modules, and our one here had the advantage of being one of the first to be set up. This allowed us time to ensure we all knew what we were doing. We began a habit of meeting regularly. The meetings were short, constant and allowed us to divide the work load between the group and then rejoining quickly afterwards to survey the latest work done.
Our early start allowed us to take a pause in the project and be ‘released’ to work on other assignments. When we returned to the project for the last few weeks, much of the groundwork was already done and all that was left was the mopping-up.
The hard-working nature of everyone in the project made for an egalitarian group, where everyone contributed evenly and diligently to the sum of the team’s parts.
There may be a few ‘I’s in ‘History and Development of Irish Traditional Music’ but there are none is this ‘team’!
Peter's Group Reflection
Monday, November 22, 2010
Fintan's Group Reflection
This group project was the first group project I have ever been involved with in an academic course. It took a little getting used to the dynamics of a group project at the start as it was quite a large group with seven members and on one knew each other. I was used to working in teams in my previous job but there was always a boss to make decisions so that the projects moved swiftly along. In a group with seven equals no one could call the shots so at the start there were many long discussions about small things with everyone afraid to make a decision. However, as we progressed this sorted itself out as time pressure meant that procrastination was reduced and decisiveness won through.
In all we worked well as a team and we decided at the second meeting that we would base our reference collection on the History and Development of Irish Traditional Music. We set up a blog on Blogger.com and we all contributed to this by posting up reviews of parts of important books, interviews with librarians in targeted music libraries/archives and notes on other topics. We met weekly and made good progress. However, midway through the semester pressures from other modules reduced the amount of time that we spent on the project and it was neglected for a few weeks until a final spurt of action by everyone in the last two and a half weeks go us over the line.
Overall, I was very happy with the way we worked as a team and every member contributed equally to the project. Each member completed his or her allotted tasks diligently and I think the final Wiki exhibits the fruits of these efforts to full effect.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Justin's Group Reflection.
Monday, November 15, 2010
From Library.ie
by abevan on 15 November, 2010
A new feature is now available on the Irish Traditional Music Archive website – interactive music scores. These are music notations that you can not only view on screen but also play back in lots of user-friendly ways. You can start, pause and stop playback anywhere you want in a score, skip forwards or backwards quickly in it, change its playback tempo or change its key. An ideal learning environment!From now on, ITMA will be regularly adding more notations from historic music collections to this area for you to enjoy, using Sibelius’s Scorch software.The first set of scores is now available here. It consists of the first 100 tunes from Ryan’s Mammoth Collection, published in Boston in the 1880s. ITMA staff will be adding more tunes from this and other collections regularly – watch their website!